{$cfg_webname}
主页 > 法学 >

论悬赏广告的法律性质

来源：wenku7.com  资料编号：WK78462 资料等级：★★★★★ %E8%B5%84%E6%96%99%E7%BC%96%E5%8F%B7%EF%BC%9AWK78462
以下是资料介绍,如需要完整的请充值下载。
1.无需注册登录,支付后按照提示操作即可获取该资料.
2.资料以网页介绍的为准,下载后不会有水印.资料仅供学习参考之用. 密 保 惠 帮助
我要下载该资源
资料介绍

论悬赏广告的法律性质(包含选题审批表,任务书,开题报告,中期检查报告,毕业论文10000字,答辩记录)
摘  要：悬赏广告是日常生活中常见的一种现象，更是一个重要的法律问题。我国法律上没有对悬赏广告法律性质进行明确规定，有关悬赏广告的法律性质学术界也有很多争议，司法实践中处理此类案件也甚感棘手，导致了关于悬赏广告的纠纷得不到有效解决。因此，对于悬赏广告的法律性质进行必要的研究和探讨具有深刻的理论价值。本文通过对“契约说”和“单方行为说”进行对比分析，认为单方行为说更为合理。单方行为说较之于契约说有其优势，它克服了契约说的弱点，其法律关系也较为简单明确，也更有利于保护行为人的权益，合理解释悬赏广告的各种复杂情形。
关键词：悬赏广告；单方行为说；契约说

Discuss the Advertisement offering a Reward of the Legal Nature
Abstract:The advertisement offering a reward is in the daily life the common one kind of phenomenon，is an important legal matter. In our country law has not carried on to the advertisement offering a reward legal nature stipulated explicitly that the related advertisement offering a reward's legal nature academic circle also has disputed，in the judicial practice handles this kind of case also really to feel thorny，caused not to be able to obtain the effective addressing about the advertisement offering a reward dispute.Therefore，conducts the essential research and the discussion regarding advertisement offering a reward's legal nature has the profound theory value.This article through right “the contract said”and“the unilateral act said”carries on the contrastive analysis，thought that the folk remedy behavior said is more reasonable.The folk remedy behavior said that compared with in the contract said that has its superiority，it has overcome weakness which the contract said that its legal relationship is also simple is clear，is also more advantageous in protects author's rights and interests，explains advertisement offering a reward each complex situation reasonably.
Key words:advertisement offering a reward;unilateral act said;contract said

目  录
摘要……………………………………………………………………………………1
关键词…………………………………………………………………………………1
一、悬赏广告法律性质的界定 ………………………………………………………2
   （一）悬赏广告的概述……………………………………………………………2
（二）两种法律性质学说的概述…………………………………………………3
二、两种法律性质学说比较分析 ……………………………………………………3
（一）两种法律性质学说争论焦点………………………………………………3
（二）两种法律性质学说相同之处………………………………………………4
（三）两种法律性质学说不同之处………………………………………………5
三、悬赏广告法律性质探索 …………………………………………………………6
（一）我国理论界对悬赏广告法律性质的态度…………………………………6
（二）我国司法实践对悬赏广告法律性质的态度………………………………7
（三）对悬赏广告法律性质的评析………………………………………………8
四、对我国有关悬赏广告法律性质的立法建议 ……………………………………9
五、结束语……………………………………………………………………………10
参考文献 ……………………………………………………………………………11
致谢…………………………………………………………………………………11
 
推荐资料